Florence Ethel Lenon, 1875–1959 (aged 84 years)
- Name
- Florence Ethel /Lenon/
- Given names
- Florence Ethel
- Surname
- Lenon
|
Birth
|
|
|---|---|
|
Baptism
|
|
|
Death of a mother
|
Note: LENON.â May 20th. suddenly, of premature confinement, Eliza, the dearly beloved wife of Arthur Lenon, leaving a sorrowing husband and four infant children to mourn their loss, youngest daughter of Mrs. W. Brooker, of Wagga Wagga, late of Campbelltown. LENON.â May 20th. suddenly, of premature confinement, Eliza, the dearly beloved wife of Arthur Lenon, leaving a sorrowing husband and four infant children to mourn their loss, youngest daughter of Mrs. W. Brooker, of Wagga Wagga, late of Campbelltown. Evening News (Sydney, NSW : 1869 - 1931) Monday 21 May 1877 p 2 Family Notices |
|
Burial of a mother
|
Note: Buried next to her grandfather Jonathan Brooker |
|
Death of a maternal grandfather
|
Cause: William died from old age and natural decay Note: He was sick for 8 days before death and was attended by Dr Eras Wren. The death information was his son James Brooker who was living at Lake Albert. The death was registered at Wagga Wagga on the 2nd of November 1885. Source: Death Certificate. |
|
Burial of a maternal grandfather
|
Cemetery: Wagga Wagga Cemetery, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia |
|
Death of a maternal grandmother
|
|
|
Burial of a maternal grandmother
|
|
|
Marriage
|
|
|
Divorce
|
Note: ARTICLE 1 ARTICLE 1 IN DIVORCE. The hearing was continued, before Judge Stopson, yesterday, of the suit brought by John Norman Douglas Campbell, a Civil servant, for a divorce from Florence Ethel Campbell, on the ground of her adultery with Otto Henser, who was joined as co-respondent. The respondent denied the allegations made against her, and cross-charged the petitioner with adultery and cruelty, on which grounds she, in turn, asked for relief. The petitioner denied the charges. There was no appearance on the part of the co-respondent. The petitioner was in the box nearly the whole day, the evidence being unfit for publication. The case was not concluded when the court rose. Evening News (Sydney, NSW : 1869 - 1931) Thursday 5 June 1902 p 6 Article. ARTICLE 2 CAMPBELL v CAMPBELL. Mr. Justice Simpson yesterday delivered his reserved judgment in the suit brought by John Norman Douglas Campbell, a Civil servant, for a dissolution of his marriage with Florence Ethel Campbell, on the ground of her adultery with Otto Heuser, who was joined as co-respondent. The respondent denied the allegations, and cross charged the petitioner with misconduct and cruelty, upon which grounds she, in turn, asked for relief. The petitioner denied the charges made against him. His Honour, having reviewed the evidence in the case, said there was not the slightest evidence before him that the respondent had an illness as she was alleged to have had. There were other reasons why he came to the conclusion that the petitioner was all together in the wrong. Campbell admitted that he went to a certain house in Elizabeth-streetâ that he was there upon two occasions. His explanation of the first visit to the house, which appeared to be an assignation house, was that he went there with some friend, who was looking for a young fellow, who was out from England. He said he believed the place to be a lodging-house. He said, moreover, that he did not know then what he afterwards knew of the place. But after he did find out what the house was, he admitted that he was there on another occasion. Upon that occasion he said he went there to find out something about a horse that was likely to win a race, and in which the woman who kept the place was interested, or, at all events, could give him some information about it. That was a very lame excuse for him to set up. There was preponderating evidence that he had committed adultery. The conclusion he had come to was that the petitioner had, without just cause, deserted his wife, and the result of the adultery, which he found was committed as far back as the first year of their marriage, although forgiven, was revived by the subsequent desertion, and he had come to that conclusion in accordance with the decision in Lewis and Lewis. Yet he could not help saying that it was very hard upon the petitioner. He granted a decree nisi, to be moved absolute in three months. Evening News (Sydney, NSW : 1869 - 1931) Wednesday 25 June 1902 p 3 Article |
|
Death of a father
|
|
|
Burial of a father
|
|
|
Death of a sister
|
|
|
Residence
|
Note: 1915 - 1926: Charlotte Street, Coolangatta 1915 - 1926: Charlotte Street, Coolangatta Harry worked as a builder, engineer and marine. |
|
Death of a husband
|
|
|
Death of a sister
|
|
|
Burial of a sister
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Burial
|
|
| father | |
|---|---|
| mother |
1843–1877
Birth: 21 February 1843
46
39
— Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia Death: 20 May 1877 — Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia |
| Marriage | Marriage — 16 February 1869 — Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia |
|
10 months
elder sister |
1869–1954
Birth: 28 November 1869
26
— Camden Town, New South Wales, Australia Death: 18 May 1954 — Penrith, New South Wales, Australia |
|
2 years
elder sister |
1871–1916
Birth: 1871
27
— Maryvale, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia Death: 28 October 1916 — Bonnie Blink, Coolangatta, Queensland, Australia |
|
3 years
elder sister |
1873–…
Birth: 21 September 1873
30
— Maryvale, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia |
|
23 months
herself |
1875–1959
Birth: 30 July 1875
32
— Maryvale, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia Death: 27 October 1959 — Widgee, Queensland, Australia |
| stepfather | |
|---|---|
| mother |
1843–1877
Birth: 21 February 1843
46
39
— Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia Death: 20 May 1877 — Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia |
| Marriage | Marriage — 5 December 1860 — Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia |
|
13 months
half-sister |
1861–1862
Birth: 1861
17
— Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia Death: 1862 |
|
2 years
half-sister |
|
|
4 years
half-sister |
1865–1865
Birth: 1865
21
Death: 1865 — Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia |
| husband |
1860–1932
Birth: 1860
— Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Death: 13 September 1932 — Brisbane, Queensland, Australia |
|---|---|
| herself |
1875–1959
Birth: 30 July 1875
32
— Maryvale, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia Death: 27 October 1959 — Widgee, Queensland, Australia |
| Marriage | Marriage — 1895 — Newtown, New South Wales, Australia |
| husband |
Private
…–
|
|---|---|
| herself |
1875–1959
Birth: 30 July 1875
32
— Maryvale, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia Death: 27 October 1959 — Widgee, Queensland, Australia |
| Birth | |
|---|---|
| Baptism | |
| Marriage | |
| Divorce | |
| Residence | |
| Death | |
| Burial | |
| Divorce |
ARTICLE 1 IN DIVORCE. The hearing was continued, before Judge Stopson, yesterday, of the suit brought by John Norman Douglas Campbell, a Civil servant, for a divorce from Florence Ethel Campbell, on the ground of her adultery with Otto Henser, who was joined as co-respondent. The respondent denied the allegations made against her, and cross-charged the petitioner with adultery and cruelty, on which grounds she, in turn, asked for relief. The petitioner denied the charges. There was no appearance on the part of the co-respondent. The petitioner was in the box nearly the whole day, the evidence being unfit for publication. The case was not concluded when the court rose. Evening News (Sydney, NSW : 1869 - 1931) Thursday 5 June 1902 p 6 Article. ARTICLE 2 CAMPBELL v CAMPBELL. Mr. Justice Simpson yesterday delivered his reserved judgment in the suit brought by John Norman Douglas Campbell, a Civil servant, for a dissolution of his marriage with Florence Ethel Campbell, on the ground of her adultery with Otto Heuser, who was joined as co-respondent. The respondent denied the allegations, and cross charged the petitioner with misconduct and cruelty, upon which grounds she, in turn, asked for relief. The petitioner denied the charges made against him. His Honour, having reviewed the evidence in the case, said there was not the slightest evidence before him that the respondent had an illness as she was alleged to have had. There were other reasons why he came to the conclusion that the petitioner was all together in the wrong. Campbell admitted that he went to a certain house in Elizabeth-streetâ that he was there upon two occasions. His explanation of the first visit to the house, which appeared to be an assignation house, was that he went there with some friend, who was looking for a young fellow, who was out from England. He said he believed the place to be a lodging-house. He said, moreover, that he did not know then what he afterwards knew of the place. But after he did find out what the house was, he admitted that he was there on another occasion. Upon that occasion he said he went there to find out something about a horse that was likely to win a race, and in which the woman who kept the place was interested, or, at all events, could give him some information about it. That was a very lame excuse for him to set up. There was preponderating evidence that he had committed adultery. The conclusion he had come to was that the petitioner had, without just cause, deserted his wife, and the result of the adultery, which he found was committed as far back as the first year of their marriage, although forgiven, was revived by the subsequent desertion, and he had come to that conclusion in accordance with the decision in Lewis and Lewis. Yet he could not help saying that it was very hard upon the petitioner. He granted a decree nisi, to be moved absolute in three months. Evening News (Sydney, NSW : 1869 - 1931) Wednesday 25 June 1902 p 3 Article |
|---|---|
| Residence |
1915 - 1926: Charlotte Street, Coolangatta Harry worked as a builder, engineer and marine. |